Performance has been something that's been hot and heavy on peoples: minds since the first 60fps COD on the 360/PS3.
#ANGER OF STICK 5 PC PC#
PC has more overhead than consoles so this would actually be running even better than their tests show on Xbox.Įven a locked 40fps would have been better thanks to VRR and LFC modern screens not sure we've been living in the same reality. What's crazy to think about is this is how it runs with similar specs on PC. It feels MUCH smoother to most eyes than 30fps, and much more like 60fps to me. If you look carefully at the gap between them 40fps is EXACTLY half way between 30 and 60 in terms of frame time (+/- 8.33ms between each). 40fps SEEMS like it is closer to 30fps than 60fps, but in terms of frame time it is 1/30, 1/40, 1/60 which is 33.33ms, 25ms and 16.66ms respectively. Hence 30fps is what we often use on a 60Hz screen (or 20fps back in the N64 days)īut there's other reasons it works so well. This is why it wouldn't work well on a 60Hz screen, 40 doesn't divide into 60 a round number of times, you would get unevenly paced frames which would look awful. Yes the tech heads are right 40 divides into 120 exactly 3 times so a new frame can be shown every 3 ticks of the device, which means it's smooth. I also use it a lot on Steam Deck as personally I think it's the sweet spot in many games. I believe Lies of P is going to have it too. Tue 12th Sep 40fps mode is great on a Plague Tale: Requiem and Hogwart's Legacy on Xbox too as well as several other PS5 games.
#ANGER OF STICK 5 PC SERIES#
And then I went into the nightclubs - some minor dips there - but you know, the whole thing was basically running at 60."ĭigital Foundry ultimately went on to sum up that a 40FPS mode in Starfield on Xbox Series X definitely seems a potential option based on the limited testing they've done so far, or Bethesda could opt for a Variable Refresh Rate mode instead and unlock the frame rate so those with VRR-supported displays would still see a smooth picture. "Neon basically runs locked to 60 frames per-second, which I couldn't quite believe. So, you know, possibly a 40 frames per-second mode with a different GPU balance or different tweak to dynamic resolution scaling bounds could be viable - or possibly something a VRR-specific mode." "Most of the time we're beyond 40 frames per-second. Then, they dropped the resolution down from 4K to 1440p (matching the Xbox Series S version) and spent a bit of time exploring the game to see what the frame rate was like. In order to test this, the team put together "the actual Xbox Series X CPU via the AMD 4800S Desktop Kit, paired with a GPU that's a close match for the PS5's", and then ran Starfield at the closest possible settings to the Xbox Series X version.
The tech wizards over at Digital Foundry have been trying to answer the question of whether Starfield could run at 60FPS on Xbox Series X, and the answer isn't simple - but it does give us hope for the future!
0 kommentar(er)
